HP S700 SSD Review

256GB SSD Performance

Comparison Products


There are some strange truths about DRAMless SSDs that go against what we've learned about SSDs over the last decade. The S700’s specification sheet doesn't show performance data with a significant amount of data on the drives. On paper, the smaller drives still have the lowest performance specifications. That is in line with other SSDs and conventional wisdom.

We also know that all SSDs, even those with a DRAM buffer, slow as you add data to the flash. That's because the cells are dirty, but also because the address map table is smaller when the drive is populated with less data. As you fill the drive, DRAMless SSDs lose performance at an accelerated rate compared to products with a DRAM buffer.

The $130 HP S700 retails for nearly the same as the Samsung 960 EVO 250GB NVMe SSD. That's a bad position to be in, but it gets worse; Newegg lists similar DRAMless 256GB-class SSDs at just $79. The Samsung 850 EVO 250GB sells for just $100 at Newegg (at the time of writing). The S700 even steps into Corsair Neutron XTi 240GB ($109.99) and 850 Pro ($137.99) territory.

We added?the Corsair Force LE 200 240GB, a DRAMless competitor, to the comparison products. It uses the Phison S11 controller. We also included the Mushkin Triactor again along with the Samsung 850 EVO. The SanDisk Ultra II also makes an appearance.

Sequential Read Performance

To read about our storage tests in-depth, please check out?How We Test HDDs And SSDs. We cover four-corner testing on?page six of our How We Test guide.

Again, the S700 takes the top spot in the sequential read test. This controller and NAND combination is almost unbeatable during a sequential read workload. If the S700’s price was more competitive, this could be a very good SSD for storing games on a secondary drive.

Sequential Write Performance

The S700 also performs well in the sequential write test. The DRAMless Force LE 200 240GB has very low sequential write performance at QD2.

Random Read Performance

Random read performance is still the weak point for the S700, and that doesn't change with the smaller capacity. Random reads are directly related to system responsiveness when you load applications.

Random Write Performance

The S700 250GB delivers better random write performance than what you might expect from an entry-level DRAMless SSD. It outperforms both the Mushkin Triactor and Corsair Force LE 200.

80 Percent Mixed Sequential Workload

We describe our mixed workload testing in detail?here and describe our steady state tests here.

Again, we see very little scaling from the DRAMless SSDs as we increase workload intensity. The S700 250GB is still competitive in this test compared to the other popular models.

80 Percent Mixed Random Workload

We can't say the same with mixed random performance. The S700 falls flat with roughly 9,000 IOPS. Performance doesn't increase with workload intensity. Instead, it goes down slightly.

Sequential Steady-State

The S700's sequential-steady state performance is similar to what we see from most TLC-based drives. There is very little improvement during the heavy write portion of the test (right side of the chart). There is also a large drop off from 100% reads and 90% reads.

Random Steady-State

All the TLC-based drives provide low performance in a steady state. The Samsung 850 EVO 250GB still musters a little over 5,000 IOPS and shows why it's the fastest TLC SATA SSD on the market.

The HP S700 250GB actually delivers more IOPS than the larger 500GB model in this workload.

PCMark 8 Real-World Software Performance

For details on our real-world software performance testing, please?click here.

The S700 250GB compares much better to similar products than the larger 500GB model. The performance simply doesn't match the price of either model we tested, though.

Application Storage Bandwidth

With common applications, the S700 250GB is only slightly slower than the 500GB. In contrast, the 850 EVO's performance drops much more between these two capacities.

PCMark 8 Advanced Workload Performance

To learn how we test advanced workload performance, please?click here.

The HP S700 with its advanced programming and 3D NAND flash still doesn't close the gap with DRAMless SSDs. The performance is only slightly faster than the DRAMless SSDs we tested with planar NAND earlier in the year. Performance needs to improve, and prices need to decrease for DRAMless SSDs to thrive.

Total Service Time

The service time tests show an unreasonable amount of latency. People buy SSDs to avoid this excessive latency, and there is technology available to utilize the flash in a better manner without unnecessarily increasing production or component costs.

Disk Busy Time

The two DRAMless SSDs suffer the highest levels of disk busy time. The correlation isn't by chance. All of the DRAMless products take longer to complete the workload.

Responsiveness Test

We included the HP S700 Pro 256GB with the S700 250GB to show the loss of responsiveness and increased power consumption. We've also included the Intel SSD 520 Series with a SandForce SF-2281 controller, which is the most popular DRAMless SSD ever made.

The S700 250GB outperforms the Phison S11-based Corsair Force LE 200 240GB, but it doesn't compete with the much older Intel SSD.

Notebook Battery Life

The HP S700 Pro lowered the bar for notebook battery life under real-world conditions. The only way HP could use more power is to take away the DRAM so the drive has to work much longer to complete the tasks for the test. The longer a drive has to work, the less time it spends in a low-power idle state.


MORE: How We Test HDDs And SSDs

MORE: All SSD Content

Create a new thread in the UK Article comments forum about this subject
No comments yet
Comment from the forums
    Your comment
  • 1275501183 2018-03-18
  • 4062511182 2018-03-18
  • 5436231181 2018-03-18
  • 9519301180 2018-03-18
  • 7373111179 2018-03-18
  • 5079941178 2018-03-18
  • 1797231177 2018-03-18
  • 4436071176 2018-03-17
  • 3514021175 2018-03-17
  • 2288211174 2018-03-17
  • 9088361173 2018-03-17
  • 3631841172 2018-03-17
  • 6261421171 2018-03-17
  • 4123821170 2018-03-16
  • 7782241169 2018-03-16
  • 391371168 2018-03-16
  • 8018761167 2018-03-16
  • 4513281166 2018-03-16
  • 3044581165 2018-03-16
  • 5892041164 2018-03-16